🔗 Share this article

Are your LinkedIn connections recognizing you as a industry expert? Do numerous commenters applauding your insights on expanding your business? Do recruiters making contact to explore opportunities?

If not, the reason might be that you're not male.

The Test: Changing Profile Gender for Increased Reach

Dozens of women participated in a collective professional network test this week following viral posts suggested that switching their gender to "male" boosted their platform visibility.

Other testers rewrote their profiles to incorporate what they termed "bro-coded" terminology - adding action-focused business buzzwords like "propel", "transform" and "accelerate". Anecdotally, their visibility also improved.

Algorithmic Bias Concerns Raised

The engagement increase has caused some to wonder whether an inherent gender bias in LinkedIn's algorithm favors male users who use online business jargon.

Similar to many large social media platforms, LinkedIn employs a computerized system to decide which posts are shown to which users - boosting some while reducing others.

Platform Response

Through a blog post, LinkedIn recognized the trend but claimed it does not factor in "demographic information" when determining content distribution. Instead, the company explained that "hundreds of signals" influence how content are received.

Changing gender on your profile does not influence how your content appears in search or feed.

Personal Experiences

A social media consultant, who changed her gender identifiers to "he/him" and her name to "Simon E", reported extraordinary results.

"The statistics I'm observing show a sixteen-fold rise in profile views and a thirteen-fold jump in impressions," she noted.

Megan Cornish, a communications strategist, began experimenting after noticing her reach decrease substantially.

The Method

• Initially, she changed her gender to "man"
• Subsequently, she used artificial intelligence to rewrite her professional summary using "masculine-oriented" language
• Lastly, she recycled previous content with similar "agentic" style

The outcome was immediate: a 415% increase in reach within seven days.

The Downside

Despite the success, Cornish expressed dissatisfaction with the approach.

"Before, my posts were softer - concise and clever, but also friendly and relatable," she explained. "Currently, the bro-coded version was assertive and self-assured - like a Caucasian man being overly confident."

She abandoned the experiment after seven days, stating "Each day I persisted, and outcomes improved, I became more frustrated."

Mixed Results

Not all testers encountered positive outcomes. Cass Cooper who changed both her profile gender to "man" and her race to "white" described a reduction in reach and engagement.

"We know there's algorithmic bias, but it's very challenging to comprehend how it operates in specific cases or why," she remarked.

Broader Implications

These tests coincide with continuing conversations about LinkedIn's unique role as both a professional network and social space.

Recent changes in recent months have reportedly caused female creators experiencing significantly reduced exposure, resulting in informal experiments where identical posts by men and women received vastly different reach.

System Details

According to LinkedIn, the platform uses artificial intelligence to classify and spread content based on multiple factors, including what's shared and the user's professional identity.

The company claims it frequently assesses its systems, including "checks for gender-related disparities."

A spokesperson suggested that recent declines in certain members' visibility might originate from higher volume due to more content on the network.

Changing Landscape

As one participant noted, "masculine-oriented language" appears to be growing on the platform.

"Users typically consider LinkedIn as more businesslike and polished," she commented. "This is evolving. It's turning into increasingly aggressive and unpredictable."