🔗 Share this article

Picture the following: a happy the Danish striker wearing Napoli's colors. Now, juxtapose that with a dejected the Slovenian forward in a Manchester United kit, appearing like he just missed a sitter. Do not worry locating a real picture of that miss; context is the enemy. Now, include statistics in a large, silly font. Remember the emojis. Post it everywhere.

Would you mention that Højlund's tally features scores in the premier European competition while Sesko does not compete in Europe? Of course not. And will you highlight that four of Højlund's goals were scored versus Belarus and Greece, or that his national team is far superior to Sesko's Slovenia and generates far more chances. If you run online for a major brand, pure interaction is your livelihood, Manchester United are the biggest draw, and context is your sworn enemy.

So the cycle of online material spins. Your next task is to scan a 44-minute interview featuring Peter Schmeichel and find the part where he calls the signing of Sesko "strange". There's a bit, where Schmeichel prefaces his remarks by saying, "Nothing negative to say about Benjamin Sesko"... well, cut that. Nobody wants that. Simply make sure "strange" and "the player" are paired in the title. People will be outraged.

This Time of Potential and Hasty Opinions

Mid-autumn has traditionally one of my preferred periods to observe football. Leaves fall, the wind turns, the teams and tactics are newly formed, everything is new and yet patterns are emerging. The stars of the season ahead are staking their claims. The summer market is closed. Nobody is mentioning the multiple trophies yet. Everyone are in contention. Right now, anything is possible.

However, for similar reasons, mid-autumn has also been one of my least favourite times to consume news on football. For while no outcomes are decided, opinions must be formed immediately. Jack Grealish is reborn. Florian Wirtz has been a crushing disappointment. Could Semenyo be the best player in the league at this moment? Please an answer immediately.

The Player as Patient Zero

In many ways, Benjamin Sesko feels like the archetype in this context, a player inextricably trapped between football's two countervailing, non-negotiable forces. The imperative to delay final conclusions, to let technical development and strategic understanding to develop. And the imperative to produce permanent verdicts, a constant stream of takes and memes, out-of-context criticisms and pointless comparisons, a square that can never truly be circled.

It is not my aim to provide a substantive analysis of Sesko's stint at Manchester United to date. He has started on four occasions in the top flight in a wildly inconsistent team, scored two goals, and had a grand total of 116 touches. What precisely are we evaluating? And do I propose to replicate the pundits' seminal masterwork "The Sesko Debate", in which two of England's leading pundits duel thrillingly on a popular show over whether Sesko needs 10 goals to be a success this season (Neville), or whether it's really more like twelve or thirteen (Wright).

A Cruel Environment

For all this I loved watching him at his former club: a powerful, fast sports car of a forward, playing in a team pitched perfectly to his abilities: afforded the freedom to attack but also the freedom to fail. And in part this is why Manchester United feels like the most unforgiving place he could possibly be right now: a place where "brutal verdicts" are summarily issued in about the time it takes to load a pre-roll ad, the club with the largest and most ruthless gulf between the patience and space he requires, and the time and air he is going to get.

We saw an example of this during the national team pause, when a viral chart handily stated that Sesko had been deemed – by a wide margin – the poorest acquisition of the recent market by a survey of 20 agents. And of course, the media are not the only ones in such behavior. Club channels, influencers, anonymous X accounts with a suspiciously high number of pornbot followers: everybody with a vested interest is now essentially aligned along the identical rules, an ecosystem explicitly nosed towards provocation.

The Mental Cost

Endless scrolling and tapping. What is happening to us? Are we aware, on any level, what this infinite stream of aggravation is doing to our brains? Quite apart from the essential weirdness of being a player in the middle of it all, aware on some surreal butterfly-effect level that each aspect about players is now essentially material, commodity, open-source property to be packaged and exchanged.

Indeed, partly this is because United are United, the corpse that continues to feed the narrative, a major institution that must always be producing the strong emotions. However, in part this is a temporary malaise, a pendulum of judgment most visibly and cruelly observed at this season, about a month after the window has closed. Throughout the summer we have been coveting players, eulogising them, salivating over them. Yet, just a few weeks in, many of those same players are now being disdained as broken goods. Should we start to worry about Jamie Gittens? Was Arsenal's purchase of their striker wise? What was the purpose of another expensive buy?

The Bigger Picture

It feels appropriate that he faces Liverpool on Sunday: a team at once on a long unbeaten run at their stadium in the Premier League and yet in their own state of perceived turmoil, like submitting a missing person’s report on a person who popped to the store half an hour ago. Defensively suspect. Mohamed Salah finished. Alexander Isak waste of money. Arne Slot losing his hair.

Maybe we have failed to understand the way the storyline of football has started to replace football itself, to influence the way we view it, an whole competition reoriented around talking points and reaction, something that occurs in the backdrop while we browse through our phones, unable to detach from the constant flow of opinions and more takes. Perhaps Sesko bearing the brunt at present. However, everyone is sacrificing a part of the experience in this process.