🔗 Share this article

Just two days before the NYC race for mayor, Michael Lange issued a significant electoral prediction – going beyond who would win overall, but precinct by precinct. The analyst, a political analyst who grew up in New York City, has spent over a decade in left-leaning activism and emerged as something of a local celebrity this year for his deep dives into municipal statistics and polling.

He released his highly detailed prediction map – accurately predicting that the progressive candidate was victorious while missing the independent candidate’s solid showing – on his Substack, the Narrative War. He has a flair for clever terms. He pointed out, as an example, the divide between the progressive stronghold, stretching from one neighborhood to Bushwick to Astoria, where he forecasted (accurately) that the left-wing candidate would triumph by large leads, and the conservative-leaning zone on affluent parts of Manhattan. In those areas, “the Free Press and financial newspapers surpass the New York Times” in audience and most voters leaned toward the independent, campaigning as a moderate alternative.

Election Night Patterns and Surprises

How was your night?

It was necessary because they were dropping around 200,000 ballots into the system every few minutes! I was actually somewhat anxious at the beginning: The candidate was ahead the early vote by a dozen percentage points, but came two big batches of votes that came in after that and the advantage went from 12 to 8%. It was concerning.

Understand, it was possible in which election day went somewhat badly for him, where the opponent was going to end up basically increasing his support from the Democratic primary. However the winner added half a million votes to his primary coalition, and that’s a huge reason why he succeeded. He went out and greatly broadened his base from the first round.

Expanding Support

How did the mayor-elect get additional support from?

He assembled the coalition that the left always wanted to build: diverse racially, it’s young, tenants and it’s people facing cost pressures. He improved significantly with minority communities, everyday New Yorkers, compared to the earlier election. Plus he boosted his core of liberal progressives, youthful radicals, and Muslims and south Asians. He couldn’t have won without making those significant inroads.

He built the alliance that progressives always wanted to build: multiracial, youthful, tenants and residents squeezed by affordability

Additionally, there were some Trump/Mamdani voters – is that a big trend?

It is a genuine phenomenon, confined to Hispanic laborers, south Asians and Muslims. Voters in immigrant strongholds that went for the former president last year backed Zohran now. But it’s not that he was gaining white working-class voters and Trump loyalists.

Voter Participation and Impact

A major development of the night was the record turnout. Who benefited?

Both sides. Turnout was much greater than anticipated. I thought it could exceed two million, but it reached 2.3 million – that is a lot of darn voters. There was a substantial anti-Mamdani block, who were motivated, but the Mamdani base was equally driven, and that sufficed to win.

You forecasted he’d get over half the ballots. Is he on course for that?

Right now it appears he’s favored to surpass half. He’s at 50.4% but there’s still around 200K ballots uncounted at that time. Thus I don’t think certain, but I think it’s likely, and I wish he achieves it so then none can claim the Republican was a disruptor.

Republican Collapse

Curtis Sliwa, the Republican candidate, is the other big story. His vote completely collapsed.

He lost a single precinct in any area. Not even Tottenville in Staten Island, which is like an highly conservative neighborhood. That really surprised me. Cuomo held very white areas, very wealthy areas and devout communities, and plus gained all of these conservatives on Staten Island who had a high participation. I think there was significant tactical voting by GOP voters. This happened prior to Trump endorsed for the candidate, but it assisted. It might have changed the outcome unless the winning alliance failed to expand.

The “Commie Corridor”

What about your often-discussed “commie corridor” – did backing for Mamdani overwhelming in those areas of Brooklyn and Queens?

In my view there was some weakening of the progressive zone in certain places like neighborhoods that have more older white ethnic folks. There, for example, the property owners and residents supported Cuomo. Thus there existed a little resistance. However overall, mostly the leftist base is a key factor why Zohran won – he was polling between high percentages in specific neighborhoods.

Jewish Voters

Prior to the vote we reported on whether Mamdani was gaining ground with Jewish New Yorkers. Is there any suggestion that he did?

There are neighborhoods with a lot of non-religious and left-inclined voters – like specific locales – where he performed strongly. However in the affluent districts like the Upper East Side, his position on Israel definitely mattered there. Likewise in the moderate communities including Queens neighborhoods, or Spuyten Duyvil and Riverdale – they all leaned Cuomo. And also, you have Jewish immigrants from Eastern Europe in southern Brooklyn, who were pretty staunchly Cuomo. Therefore it’s unclear if there were major surprises here, but he retained more progressive Jewish neighborhoods and even parts of the another locale by big margins.

Political Impact

Has Mamdani rewritten what New York represents in politics? Will the commie corridor become a launch pad for progressive contenders?

Absolutely, it’s no coincidence that key figures from progressives come from a handful of neighborhoods in the boroughs. I believe that there will be more of that – people will come from these neighborhoods to be promoted to higher office.

But I believe that every city in America could develop their own commie corridor. Urban places are the epicenters of leftwing power in the nation – because youth reside there, tenancy is common and they are places where individuals struggle by the inequalities we face.